Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Bridge on the River Kwai

June 15th 2006 08:00
The Bridge on the River Kwai
The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957)

David Lean's rousing WWII epic pretty much cleaned out the Oscars in 1957, with Alec Guinness winning the Best Actor award for his portrayal of British Officer Colonel Nicholson, who loses his way in a Japanese POW camp in Burma. The big budget film involved the construction and demolition of a life-size bridge, and was shot in Ceylon (now Sri-Lanka). American actor William Holden was brought onboard as a drawcard for the U.S. audience, and is the catalyst for the film's surprising, chaotic and ambiguous ending.

We start the film with the Colonel leading his soldiers into the POW camp under the watchful eyes of the brutal and villainous Japanese. They whistle an upbeat and very english tune (you'll know it when you hear it, it's pretty famous now) as they jauntily march in, setting the tone of the film - the Colonel isn't going to let war get in the way of his troops behaving in a decent and British manner. The Japanese won't have it though, and their commanding officer Colonel Saito sets about trying to get the officers to work alongside the other POWs in the camp (an act that contravenes the articles of war). Nicholson is steadfast in his refusal to work, and a battle of wills erupts between the two men. Will Saito succeed in breaking the refined and proud British officer? You'll have to watch the film to find out.

Meanwhile, American POW Shears (all-American hero William Holden) escapes from the camp and makes it back behind Allied lines. He informs the British that the Japanese are building a bridge that will re-open supply lines to their front and they promptly put together a team to blow up the bridge before it can be put into use... roping Shears in to lead the way. From here we have the film working two stories along in parallel... Shears and co. are racing against time to infiltrate Japanese-held territory before the bridge can be completed while Col. Saito works frantically to finish the job, battling against unco-operative prisoners, his own side's low morale and his need to save face.

What makes the 'Bridge on the River Kwai' such an accomplished classic? David Lean, a respected and celebrated British director (probably Britain's most famous after Hitchcock), kicked his career into a whole new phase with this film. Everything is big and magnificent and the camera work and cinematography is iconic. Yes, iconic - some of the shots have burnt themselves into my brain! Everything you see here is real... the location work is breathtaking and the bridge is life-sized, this is what they mean when they say 'epic' - not CGI cities and soldiers (ahem, 'Kingdom of Fear' and 'Troy' take note).

Also, Alec Guinness (who was at odds with the director over his role) creates a tragic and mythic figure in Col. Nicoholson. I gasped at the film's ending and it's ambiguity... did he do that on purpose or not? It's something film critics have been debating for nearly fifty years now. As I mentioned before, Guinness won a much-deserved Best Actor oscar for his work here and he effectively got under the skin of the British Officer archetype and did new and exciting things to it without resorting to eccentricity, overacting or silliness.

I avoided this film as a kid because it sounded so boring and old man-ish, but I was wrong. This is truly a great film and experience. Truly! Talking about it here makes me want to go and watch it again but alas, my DVD player is broken so I'll have to reminisce whilst looking at photographs from it.

Alec Guinness
Sir Alec Guinness as Col. Nicholson


TRIVIA: Alec Guinness turned down his role at first as he thought it was dull. Cary Grant was another choice for Guinness' role but he had recently starred in a flop so Laurence Olivier was asked instead - he turned it down. Charles Laughton agree to do it at one point but apparently turned it down citing that he couldn't handle such a long shoot in the heat of Ceylon. Guinness eventually agreed to play the Colonel. The character of Shears was intended for Humphrey Bogart at first but he was unavailable.

Sessue Hayakawa (Col. Saito) was a big Japanese silent film star. To encourage him for the scene in which he cries, director David Lean told him he was a bad actor.

The real Bridge on the River Kwai took prisoners two months to build. The one in the film took eight months.

The film's two writers were on the Hollywood Blacklist, so they couldn't be given credit for the film. The credit instead went to Pierre Boulle, who had written the novel the film was based on. He subsequently won the Oscar, despite not having actually written any of the script.

The real-life Saito was actually not at all villainous and became friends with the real-life Officer that Guinness' character was based on (Colonel Toosey), even to the extent that Toosey spoke up at Saito's war crimes trial and saved him from execution, and Saito made a trip to England many years later to visit Toosey's grave.

Alec Guinness and director David Lean collaborated on six films in total - 'Great Expectations' (1946), 'Oliver Twist' (1948), 'Bridge on the River Kwai' (1957), 'Lawrence of Arabia' (1962), 'Doctor Zhivago' (1965) and 'A Passage to India' (1984).





73
Vote
   


Zulu

June 14th 2006 08:22
The film that proved the British could make an epic just as detailed, big-scale and stirring as anything that Hollywood pumped it's millions of dollars into. 'Zulu' also introduced most of the world to one Maurice Micklewhite, better known to audiences as Michael Caine. It also just happens to be quite a good movie as well.
Zulu
Zulu (1963)

'Zulu' focuses on a real historical event that saw less than 300 British troops defend themselves against thousands of Zulu warriors. What makes the stand all the more frightening is that the same warriors had massacred over a thousand British troops at another outpost just prior to their attack. Anyone unfamiliar with this (fairly obscure to anyone outside of South Africa I dare suggest) slice of history will probably be as compelled as I was to see the doomed seige played out. In the face of all the hopelessness we are introduced to a great mix of colourful characters, ranging in nationality and disposition, and headed up by the three leads of the film...

Stanley Baker (who also produced the film) is painted as the more heroic and well-adjusted of the two superior officers, and flanking him is one rather young and fresh-faced Michael Caine, ironically playing against type in his breakthrough role, as an aristocratic officer more concerned with his own prestige than anything else. Jack Hawkins balances it out by playing the Zulu-savvy priest who, when his pleas to the officers to abandon fort are unheard, hits the bottle pretty hard. The direction is nothing too flashy but pretty darn solid and focused, and the film's coup lies in it's use of real Zulu warriors.

'Zulu' is a magnificently grand film of old fashioned values like honour and pride (and may confuse the more modern viewer, like me, as a result - especially when character motivations are barely explained and it's left up to audience to assume they make their stand because of such values). The atmosphere is superbly built on tension and fear, and it was refreshing to see the Zulus portrayed in a fairly good light despite the fact that they're the enemy of the film's heroes and that this film was made 40 years ago. 'Zulu', put simply, is a stirring and entertaining spectacle of good performances and a tautly recreated battle.
Zulu
Old school Zulu poster

TRIVIA…
- Zulu’ was banned in South Africa out of fear that it might incite the blacks to riot.
- Michael Caine’s speaking voice of the time sounded nothing like this character’s… many journalists at the time were surprised when they interviewed him and heard his working-class cockney vernacular.
- The real-life President of the Zulu Nation was enlisted to play the chief of the Zulus, of who he was actually descended.
- Richard Burton narrated the opening and closing blocks of text.
- The other Zulu battle mentioned in the film was covered in the somewhat lesser film 'Zulu Dawn' (1979), which starred Burt Lancaster, Denholm Elliot and Bob Hoskins.

74
Vote
   


Apocalypse Now

June 8th 2006 06:27
Apocalypse Now
Apocalypse Now (1979)
As with a lot of great films, it took me a while to finally get around to watching this. Anyone familiar with it should bear in mind that this is a review of the recently released 'Redux' version, featuring extra footage. I haven't seen the original ('proper'?) version, so I can't really compare the two.

'Apocalypse Now' is a war film. Many consider it to be the Vietnam War film. I'm not sure I agree with that, there is, after all, 'Platoon' and 'The Deer Hunter' to contend with, but it's certainly up there as one of major pieces of film to deal with Vietnam. Loosely based on the novel 'The Heart of Darkness' the film focuses on a U.S. Captain's (Martin Sheen) mission to seek out and assassinate a rogue U.S. Colonel (Marlon Brando) deep in the Cambodian jungle. The movie tracks the Captain and his team's progress down the river through war-torn Vietnam, and as they get closer and closer to their destination they descend further and further into the madness of the war.

First off, this film is insane. A mixture of the macabre, humourous and heart-stopping, this is the filmic personification of the madness of war. Each stop of the Captain's boat leads to more and more inexplicably crazy situations, and the eventual destination is an unsettling trip into the surreal. The director (Francis Ford Coppola) displays possibly his most ingenious use of imagery, right from the outset (the fan blades substituting for a helicopter's) to the end (Marlon Brando's face forever etched in shadows, a visual descent into the depths of insanity).

The acting is all top-shelf stuff too. Sheen is suitably toughened and haunted as a man on the edge. Brando resists going too far over the top, and gives possibly his last great performance before descending into obese laziness. Robert Duvall is brief but memorable as Kilgore - cue memorable line; "I love the smell of napalm in the morning'. And Dennis Hopper is great and all spazzed out as a hyperkinetic hippy journalist.

The film, at times, almost borders on pretentious (Ford Coppola's artsy "My film isn't about Vietnam, it is Vietnam" opinion on it certainly does, at least) but it's saved by outstanding performances, remarkable direction and cinematography, and great dialogue. I'll just leave you with a great line from Brando that just about sums up the film; "They let us drop bombs on people, but we weren't allowed to write 'fuck' on our planes because it was obscene".

Robert Duvall
Robert Duvall in 'Apocalypse Now'

TRIVIA: Laurence Fishburne lied about his age (he was 15) in order to get the role of Tyrone. Watch out for a short cameo by Harrison Ford at the film's beginning.

'Apocalypse Now' is reputed to be one of the worst shoots in cinema history, taking more than 3 years to complete. Harvey Keitel was original cast as Captain Willard but was later replaced by Martin Sheen. Sheen then suffered a heart attack and the film had to wait for his recovery in order to continue. Amongst various other film-making catastrophes, the film was also dogged by a typhoon (!)

'Apocalypse Now' was nominated for 8 Academy Awards. It won 2 of them, for Best Cinematography and Best Sound. The other 6 nominations were; Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor (Robert Duvall), Best Screenplay, Best Art Direction/Set Decoration, Best Director and Best Film Editing.
74
Vote
   


Gallipoli

June 7th 2006 08:46
Gallipoli (1980)
A rather striking poster for Gallipoli
A landmark of Australian Cinema. 'Gallipoli' (1980) is a distinctly Australian-looking film that deals with an important part of Australian history. Along with 'Breaker Morant', it's probably one of the most groundbreaking films in this country. And it's got young Mel Gibson in it too.

Any Aussie school-kid can tell you about Gallipoli, the events and the film, most likely. The tragedy of WW1's war of attrition has never been more evident, or struck our soil as much, than through the acts of senseless slaughter that befell thousands of Australian soldiers in Turkey. Peter Weir's film hammers this home by spending it's first half following two talented Western Australian athletes (Jack and Frank) on their quest to join up and fight in the war. The responsibility for the waste of Australian youth and talent is put squarely in the hands of the British by the film's end, as Jack and Frank reach the front line only in the last half hour to find that the 'Great War' is an inhuman machine fed by miscommunication and a complete disregard for life


[ Click here to read more ]
68
Vote
   


Moderated by Luke
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]