Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Red Dragon

November 13th 2006 09:21


Based on the first (and what is supposedly to be the best) of Thomas Harris’ three Hannibal Lector novels, ‘Red Dragon’ is also the second film version of said book. The style of the direction… is satisfactory. Obviously, this film could never be a patch on ‘Silence of the Lambs’, in any way whatsoever. Anthony Hopkins plays Hannibal Lector for the third time, chewing up the screen whenever the plot deigns to let him appear. Ed Norton does what he can, and Harvey Keital is almost a non-entity. It just seems like there was a lot of book, and the film does it’s best to fit it all in, and we’re given enough information to make certain assumptions and connections, but it’s just not as tight as it should be!

There’s a lot of stuff in ‘Red Dragon’… you’ve got Edward Norton’s retired FBI genius, lured back to the fore by his one-time boss (Keital), and aided by the ever-co-operative anti-hero Lector, tracking down a serial-killer known as ‘The Tooth Fairy’ (Fiennes), who is courting a blind woman (Watson). Not nearly enough time is spent explaining the back story of the Tooth Fairy, who should – by rights – be the centre of the story. But, with all the fuss that has come in years with Hopkins’ portrayal of Lector, the plot of the film is almost a sub-plot. ‘Silence of the Lambs’ worked because Lector was more of a romantic lead than a villain, the main plot was all about Buffalo Bill. Anyway, enough griping.

‘Red Dragon’ isn’t a shit film by any stretch, and I certainly didn’t see the ending coming, so at least that was a nice surprise. Ralph Fiennes and Watson are probably the best of the cast here, but neither is really given a chance to truly run with their roles.

See Also: ‘Manhunter’ (1986), Michael Mann’s film version of ‘Red Dragon’, starring Brian Cox as Hannibal Lector. ‘Silence of the Lambs’ (1991), the superb Oscar-winning film that kicked off all the Hannibal-hype. ‘Hannibal’ (2001), Ridley Scott’s controversial film of the third Lector novel, also starring Anthony Hopkins.
80
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
6 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by JohnDoe

November 14th 2006 23:11
Red Dragon, A shockingly bad movie that looks like it was shot as a movie of the week.

Like the Italian Job (remake) you can tell that Ed Norton had a gun to his head making this. (He was forced under contract)

Poorly edited and lazily performed, nice tattoo though.
Bottom line a typical modern day remake of a fine film.

I am a massive fan of Michael Mann's Manhunter, its my favourite in the series and thought this lacked any of the punch.

Comment by Luke

November 15th 2006 09:27
How to rate the four (so far) Hannibal films John?

I haven't seen Hannibal but I'd easily put Silence of the Lambs first, probably followed by Manhunter (though a long way behind) and then Red Dragon.

Comment by JohnDoe

November 15th 2006 22:25

I put Manhunter as #1 (Stylish, controlled with great performances from Timothy Noonan, Brian Cox and Will Petersen)

Then Hannibal at #2 (Fun Black comedy-This is the only one of the films that has suited Anthony Hopkins comedic performance as Hannibal, so OTT its like he is in a theatre play)

Silence Of The Lambs #3 (Well made movie that goes to great efforts to create a realistic, psudeo doco feel ala French Connection- it works until Anthony hopkins appears, hamming it up and removing any believability)

Red Dragon a distant #4

Comment by Luke

November 16th 2006 06:46
woah... guess I'll have to watch Hannibal then, I think that's the first time I've ever heard anyone put Hannibal above Silence of the Lambs.

Comment by JohnDoe

November 16th 2006 08:14
I am aware Im in the minority here,

I just find Anthony Hopkins ruined Silence of The Lambs because it all feels so real till he turns up. Everyone else plays such nuanced, authentic feeling roles and his is like a comic book villian.

Most people hate Hannibal because they are looking for a thriller, what it does is satire the genre with class and pay loving homage to gore meisters of the past. It fits in perfectly with Hopkins larger than life theatrics.

For my money Brian Cox is the only Hannibal that can offers charismatic chills instead of smiles, Tomothy Noonan as teh toothfairy is the most frightening of all.

Comment by BlackWarrior

January 24th 2007 13:38
ummm I partially agree with John Doe!! In the sense that I liked Hannibal better than SOTL however I consider both of them great films!! But totally disagree about Hopkins though... I thought his performance was one of the highlights of the film!!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
318 Posts dating from May 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Luke
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]