the dark knight REVIEW i tell the truth
July 29th 2008 11:27
everyone is all like full manging on the new Batmans movie. when was the last time everyone got this excited about part 6 of a major movie franchise? no dont answer that it is what i like to call a retorical question. the answer is POLICE ACADEMY 6. aaaaaand THAT movie DIDN'T have a major star die before hand. and yet it still rules. you might ask what am i tryin to say here? well i will leave that up in the air.
but really what i am tryin to say is that the POLICE ACADEMY movies are an institusion that rarely get the respect they deserve. after part 5 of the police academy films everyone at the time was like DAMN how they gonna top that without getting mahoney back? and then along came POLICE ACADEMY 6: CITY UNDER SEIGE and the moviemakers won EVERYONE over with a massive twist - this time the cops go UNDERCOVER. add in some sweet sound effects from eddie murphie in one of his signatur roles and of course TACKLEBERRY the greatest movie cop of all time and you have yourself a film that is both a satisfyin classic and a boundry pushing sequel. the critics were silenced.
today we have a similar thing. the dark knight AKA BATMAN 6: THE RETURN OF THE JOKER sees Michael Keatons Batman face off against the joker one more time. jack nicholson was far too old to reprise his role and turned down a lot of money to even make a cameo so it was up to young bad boy and recreational drug user HEATH LEDGER to step into jacks shoes to play the joker. running at well over 3 and a half hours it is the longest of all the batman films and looks to be the most popular yet.
here is my verdict. its good but its not THAT good. i would rate it somewhere between batmans forever and Batman and robin. there are a few glaring faults that will bug even the most easygoing of batman fans the most obvious being that the joker DIED in the first film. absolutely no reference is made to this at all. also as good as it is to see michael keaton return to play batman once again i feel he is missing the edge of val kilmer.
i have to admit that my attention wavered at the 2 hour mark. 3 and a half hours is just too long for a movie about cartoon characters. does anyone take stuff like this that seriously? it is a very dark movie and there was not nearly enough poon to lighten the tone for family viewing. i would not take my kids to see this movie id probably leave them in the car with a deck of cards.
TRIVIA: plans are already underway to make batman 7 which is rumoured to be titled THE MAN WHO IS A BAT. having brought to the screen the penguin, the riddler, the two face (twice) and the joker (twice) the producers are now looking to put the last of the big batman villains up on the big screen, this will be KING TUT and he will be played by HURLEY out of the TV show LOST. it is unknown if michael keaton will return as batman as he has a lot of nothing to do and probably prefers fillin out centrelink forms (i know i do).
| 23 |
| Vote |
Shared on














Add Comments

Comments (4)







